|
It
was a strange time to be in Boston in the midst of the US election.
The tension was palpable and the support for Kerry-a native son
of the city-pervasive. Right up until counting started the mood
was optimistic. Early exit polls suggested a Kerry victory. But
very soon it all started to turn for the Democrats. By 5:30am on
election day, as I sat glued to the television abandoning my plans
to observe the downtown Kerry victory rally, it was
all but over. Bush was going to win.
The
following day the usually lively city seemed melancholic. Over breakfast,
hotel patrons spoke openly about their disappointment. Some told
me they were embarrassed to be an American. They felt isolated and
that they were living in another universe to their Bush-supporting
compatriots. That evening in a shop I greeted an attendant Hi.
How you doing?
His
response: I'm looking for a new country to live in,
his words indicative of the deep ruptures that now exist within
the US.
Sometime
on Wednesday, President Thabo Mbeki officially congratulated George
Bush. He wished him well and fervently hoped for greater
world stability and peace under his leadership. No one noticed.
The US is a country that is wrapped up in itself these days despite
its military exploits abroad. Those of a liberal persuasion-or at
least a sizeable proportion of the 56 million people or 48% of the
electorate who voted for Kerry-are struggling to figure out what
went wrong and what is going on. Much soul searching is being done.
When
asked what issues mattered most in choosing a president, survey
data in the New York Times revealed that moral values
ranked top with economy and jobs, followed by terrorism and the
Iraq war. Seemingly issues such as tax, education and health care
were seen as less important. A swathe of Americans feel that the
moral world is crumbling about them. A strong, principled leader
that can oppose abortion, stem-cell research, and gay marriage is
what they feel is needed. Just over half of voting Americans feel
that Bush is such a person. To the remainder, Bush as a moral icon
is laughable, given his warmongering overseas.
Meanwhile,
Mbeki, in his message to Bush, appealed for renewed support
for, and interest in Africa and the developing world, reform of
world institutions and an era of multilateralism marked by a concerted
drive to deal decisively with the challenge of poverty and underdevelopment.
It is hard to imagine that this is even on the map for the US right
now. A conservative revolution is on the march.
It
is easy for those from a liberal perspective to write this off or
treat Bush supporters as if they are misguided bible-bashers. But
the problem is more complex than that. It is time to face the fact
that the right-wing in the US is organised. They moved door-to-door
securing their position. The Bush campaign utilised 1,2 million
volunteers with four times as many workers in Ohio than 2000. They
sold Faith, Family and Flag and the majority of the
electorate bought it.
This
suggests that many fear some sort of global moral vacuum that they
think the Republicans can fill. Such views litter internet chat
rooms across the US. As one Bush supporter put it: I'm sorry
but I don't lose sleep over Iraq. What I do lose sleep over is my
children's future in the immoral cess pit that this country is becoming.
We
all want a safe and decent world; one that embodies good values.
This is why Bush attracted the vote of some moderates as well as
his traditional neo-conservative and Christian fundamentalist supporters.
But their votes have endorsed, whether knowingly or not, an approach
whereby the language of moral values will continue to be used to
hide a value-free political and economic agenda.
The
politics of morality is a new global battleground. The results can
be disastrous. Estimates put the death toll in Iraq as anywhere
between 20 000 and 100 000 civilians. These people were killed in
the name of freedom, democracy and to allegedly make the world a
safer place.
But
who has really benefited from this moral campaign? Mostly
those who sell weapons, reconstruction contractors and private security
firms, many close to the Bush regime. The Bush administration has,
in Iraq's most vulnerable moment, tendered it off to the lowest
bidder with no discernible benefit to its indigenous economy. Defence
contracts worth 76 billion dollars, for example, have been connected
to nine out of thirty members of the US Defense Policy Group.
In
South Africa we cannot ignore these developments. The influence
of the Bush administration is going to be felt more than before
in the coming years. Negotiating investment may soon not only be
about crude economic negotiations alone. Is it possible that South
African constitutional approaches to issues such as gay marriage
could be on the table in future trade talks? As South Africans we
must not simply beg for investment or bend over backwards to get
it no matter the cost. We need to unmask what is going on and ask
what the real price of investment might be.
This
is particularly important given that the language of morality may
also find resonance in conservative parts of Africa. Think of the
views of some African churches on homosexuality. Will these confluences
of interest be used to open more economic doors into Africa for
Republican-aligned companies that give little back to local economies?
We cannot simply dismiss the right-wing any more or get away with
taunts of imperialism. Poking fun at Bush's gaffs on the podium
is not enough. A serious analysis of the politics of morality and
conservatism and its implications for the developing world is desperately
needed. Supporting moral values sounds benign but we must ensure
that the debate on morality is detached political projects.
It
is time for a renewed interest in the US. We need to reach out to
those who do not want morality used negatively. It is time for new
alliances with liberals and progressives in the US, many of whom
feel besieged in their own country right now. After all, there are
only about 1 400 days to the next US election.
Brandon
Hamber writes the column "Look South": an analysis
of trends in global political, social and cultural life and its
relevance to South Africa on Polity, see http://www.polity.co.za/pol/opinion/brandon/.
"Look South" published by

|